• 5 Reasons We Reject Our Own

    The gospel accounts of Mark, Luke and John record incidents of Jesus and his ministry being rejected in his home town of Nazareth. When we read these accounts we sadly discover that this meant the people of Nazareth were unable to receive everything that Jesus had for them, even though in Luke’s account the people seem to be asking Jesus to, “Do here in your hometown what we have heard you did in Capernaum.”

    I think in our churches today it is imperative that we have a culture of raising and releasing our own and not rejecting our own. The rest of this post considers five reasons and the roots that they stem from those reasons that cause us to reject our own, rather than release them.

    The accounts in the gospels can be found in these passages:
    Mark 6:1-6
    Luke 4:23-30
    John 7:1-3 (note verse 5)

    1. FAMILIARITY

    “Isn’t that the carpenter?” “Aren’t these his brothers?” Brothers, by the way, that at this point did not believe in Jesus themselves. The hometown crowd knew Mary and the scandal surrounding the first born, they also knew Jesus’ brothers, James, Joseph, Simon and Judas and his sisters who are unnamed. Their questions reveal a common trait. This person cannot be special, we know him.

    The root of this problem is JUDGEMENT. Our judgement of people and their circumstances prevents us from receiving from them when we should recognise that each and everyone of us are broken vessels and any use that we have to God is by his grace.

    2. THE TALL POPPY SYNDROME

    This is the human tendency to cut down a person who seems to be getting ahead. A peer whose profile is increasing or whose skill is developing, whose work or character is getting them noticed. This trait is very evident in British culture, just take a look at some of our reporting media, looking for any opportunity to dish the dirt as we say. Of course, it is us, the public, that fuel that because it sells.

    The root of this problem is ENVY.

    3. OUR OWN INSECURITIES

    Not dissimilar to the tall poppy syndrome our own insecurities can cause us to be really negative about people in our world and therefore be slow to praise and empower.

    The root of this problem is FEAR. We wonder, fearfully wonder, will there be a place for me?

    4. OUR PRECONCEPTIONS

    Jesus faced rejection at different times for all kinds of reasons but imagine facing rejection for healing a man who had been paralysed for 38 years. The reason for the rejection, you did it on the sabbath. Our views, our preconceptions can mean that we are not open to new things, to things that are done differently than we’ve previously known or experienced.

    The root of this problem is RELIGION, and it is far more widespread than we think.

    5. NEPOTISTIC ACCUSATIONS

    Our failure to praise and raise our own, or from within can come because we fear that people will accuse us of providing jobs for the boys. They will question our motives and therefore, even when our motives are pure we draw back because we fear the accusation.

    The root of this problem is THE FEAR OF PEOPLE. We need to remember that God said to  Jeremiah, “Do not be afraid of them for I am with you.” Jeremiah 1:8

    In Conclusion

    My hope is that in all our churches and organisations we will raise, praise, equip and empower our own more than ever before to be the very best that they can be and take what God has begun in and through us to a whole new level.

  • 4 Ways To Lead Well – With or Without the Title

    In recent years much has been said about not needing the title “leader” to be a leader. You don’t have to be the “Director” or “Manager” or whatever that title is at your organisation to lead. Just because you aren’t a “leader” on the org chart doesn’t mean you can’t lead in your role, that’s the idea. That said you may well be the leader on the org chart and these thoughts apply equally to you

    Being a leader in today’s workspace has a lot more to do with the relationships people have with you and the trust you’re given by your superiors and peers alike. Here are four things that earn big leadership and trust points as you continue to grow as a leader and continue to be trusted as a leader in your role:

    1. Do what you say you’re going to do, when you say you’re going to do it.

    This one seems simple, but you’d be surprised how jarring this is for some people. One of the key elements of leading is being someone that people can trust. Not trust in an “I know something you don’t know” kind of way, but be someone that can be trusted to follow through. If you come through on everything you say you will, people are going to recognise it. It may not be right away, but over time you’ll become a “go-to person” when important projects, decisions, etc. come down the line. If you’re crushing it in the everyday tasks, your peers and leaders will notice and trust that you’re a person who keeps their word.

    2. Live the culture.

    Part of your leader’s role is to set the tone for the organisation. They work hard to come up with a mission, values, vision, whatever you want to call it, and then they implement that culture in the organisation. If you want to grow as a leader, hop on board. As you lean in to and live the culture that’s being created, you’ll grow into an ambassador for the exemplary employee, volunteer and team member. Culture is created for the benefit of the organisation, those it serves and the team, so if you lead the way in owning that culture, everyone around you will benefit and follow your lead.

    3. Fill the gaps.

    Part of leading is finding ways to improve your organisation. That doesn’t just need to come from the top, down, though. Save your leader some stress by going ahead and filling those gaps. Be a gap filler. Don’t go around bragging about how great you are because you went above and beyond to cover a glaring hole, though. Filling gaps for the recognition isn’t leading; it’s sucking up. Lead your team by making it the best it can be. Make yourself an integral and go-to member of the team that leads the way in making things happen.

    4. Ask

    This is one of the easiest and most difficult ways to lead. By simply asking your leader what you can do to lead from your current spot, you show a lot of courage and responsibility that comes with being a leader. However, be prepared that everything you hear may not be what you want to hear. What you hear might require more effort or difficult conversation. But all of that is part of being a leader. Sometimes you’ll ask how you can grow as a leader, and you’ll find out about some blind spots that you didn’t know you had. Sometimes you’ll find out that you aren’t doing as great of a job at following through as you thought. That’s ok, though. Because you asked, you now know and can show your leadership by owning your shortcomings and starting to correct them. Leaders can’t be above reproach, and when you admit that, you begin to truly lead yourself as well as those around you.

    Step out today from the pack and be a leader, title or not.

  • Fujimura – Art Inspired by Faith

    Decades before Makoto (“Mako”) Fujimura became America’s most successful evangelical fine artist — and even longer before he advised Martin Scorsese on the director’s new movie, Silence — an unplanned turn down a darkened museum hall in Tokyo defined his artistic calling.

    Awaiting him there were dozens of fumi-e, bronze and wooden tiles bearing an image of Jesus or the Virgin Mary.

    During Japan’s 250-year persecution of its Christians, magistrates forced suspected believers to trample the images or face torture and death. Yet Japanese Christianity was never eliminated, and Fujimura, who encountered the images just after his own conversion, saw in their “deeply scarred mystery” a skewed testimony and a personal touchstone.

    “Everything I’ve done has stemmed from that,” he said.

    Today, Fujimura is the most successful serious artist of openly evangelical faith in the U.S., and probably in the world. His larger paintings sell for up to $400,000 and defy the secular art establishment’s unspoken commandment: Thou shalt not reward an artist who claims explicit Christian inspiration.

    img_0102
    Artist Makoto Fujimura.
    Photo courtesy of Andrew H. Kim

    At the same time, his ravishing semiabstract canvases and his work as a writer and administrator have eroded the corresponding prejudice among evangelicals: Thou shalt not trust modern art.

    Says fellow artist and sometime collaborator Bruce Herman, “He’s a kind of household name; if people think of contemporary artists who are Christians they immediately think of Mako.”

    Most recently, the fumi-e have led Fujimura into a kind of partnership with Scorsese.

    The “trampling blocks” are pivotal in Scorsese’s new movie, Silence. Fujimura is credited on the film as a “special adviser” and has written a kind of companion book about Shusaku Endo, the author of the 1966 novel from which the movie is adapted.

    The association — Scorsese calls Fujimura a “remarkable artist and writer”— may gain Fujimura enough nonevangelical recognition to attain an elusive goal: street cred — not just as an artist, but one of faith — among non-Christians.

    A personal touchstone:

    “In grade school I used to play baseball on the beach at Kamakura,” Fujimura said recently over buckwheat tea. “That was one of the places where they lined up Christians to step on the fumi-e.”

    A youthful 56, he wears a cowled wool sweater and cuffed-up jeans, either for style or because rain has turned his bucolic property near Princeton, N.J., into a small swamp.

    His family is distinguished and haunted. One grandmother died in the Allied firebombing of Tokyo; one grandfather, then No. 2 in Japan’s wartime education ministry, toured the horrors of Hiroshima a week after it became the original ground zero.

    Mako was born in Boston while his scientist father was doing postdoctoral work with the linguist and activist Noam Chomsky. Fujimura attended middle school, high school and college in the U.S. and then returned to Tokyo for a crucial six years. It was there that he mastered the traditional Japanese nihonga tradition, in which pigments made from pulverized semiprecious stones refract seemingly infinitely, and merged it with a New York-style abstraction to create a unique look.

    He experienced his Christian conversion in Tokyo through American Protestant missionaries. And his encounter with the fumi-e provided his underlying themes: beauty, death, faith and resilience. In 1992 he became the youngest artist ever to have work acquired by Tokyo’s Museum of Contemporary Art.

    His success stateside was less meteoric. In the ’90s, his paintings sold quietly — and since they do not include obvious symbols, most buyers were unaware of the role of Christianity in their inspiration. He became a leader in a movement to reconcile evangelicals to contemporary art, but it was small.

    “We were like the Hubble Telescope, sending out these almost futile messages in hopes that someone could hear them,” he said.

    img_0207
    Makoto Fujimura’s “Grace Remains” is 73 cm x 91 cm, mineral pigments and gold on Kumohada paper, 2016.

    Exclusively represented by Artrue International, to be exhibited by Waterfall Mansions, New York City, in May-June 2017. Photo courtesy of Alyson Lecroy.

    His sometimes dark concerns ran up against what Greg Wolfe, editor of the religion-and-arts journal Image and an early champion, calls an evangelical resistance to “the idea of grace working through fallen things.”

    Yet that idea took on tragic national resonance in 2001. Fujimura’s young family lived in downtown Manhattan, three blocks from what, one bright morning, became the new Ground Zero. Amid the smoke and mourning after 9/11, he co-founded Tribeca Temporary, a collective for talented but traumatized displaced artists. The act of vision and generosity enhanced his career. Grateful art-world players touted him; the White House appointed him to the National Council on the Arts; he gained a wider evangelical audience for his vision of God amid “the ever-expanding ground zeros of the world.”

    His work was distinctive and ambitious: from the raw orange flame climbing against a riverine background in “Ghost,” done shortly after 9/11, to a series reflecting the prose of Dante and T.S. Eliot, collaborations with musicians and other painters, and breathtaking modernist grids of gold leaf, another Japanese nihonga staple.

    James Elkins, an influential critic at the Art Institute of Chicago, described Fujimura as pioneering “a new kind of art, about hope, healing, redemption, refuge, while maintaining visual sophistication and intellectual integrity.”

    Among conservative Christians, says Wolfe, “Mako became a kind of a good pied piper, leading people into greater ease of dialogue with the contemporary art world.”

    In 2010, Crossway Books became the first major evangelical publisher to release an edition of the four Christian Gospels with abstract illustrations, done by Fujimura. In 2015, he was named director of the Brehm Center for Worship, Theology and the Arts, a buzzing hub of the powerhouse Fuller Theological Seminary.

    There are still dissatisfactions. Fujimura is well-known in Asia but his art remains unrepresented in most major American museums and unreviewed in key publications such as The New York Times. Elkins maintains that were it not for Fujimura’s outspoken Christianity he would belong to the international art elite along with luminaries such as Germany’s Gerhard Richter.

    The Scorsese connection may help. In 2013 one of the producers of Silence who knew of Fujimura’s fascination with Endo’s novel suggested he write an accompanying book.

    At first Fujimura worried that the film might be “a culture wars project.”

    But the script impressed him, and a 90-minute meeting with Scorsese convinced him of the director’s intellectual enthusiasm as well as earnestness — “you know when something is a deep calling.”

    Because the film was delayed, “Silence and Beauty” came out half a year earlier. In addition to taking on Endo’s novel, it is a meditation on Fujimura’s own art, and a provocative speculation on the impact upon Japan of its suppression of Christianity.

    His involvement may help the film among evangelical elites who were scandalized by Scorsese’s 1988 film The Last Temptation of Christ and who might otherwise have shunned the Catholicism or dark subject matter of “Silence.”

    In an online review in the evangelical magazine Christianity Today, Brett McCracken wrote: “Silence is not just about mission. The film itself is missional,” extremely high praise. An adjacent ad is for Fujimura’s book.

    As twilight fell, Fujimura excused himself to talk to some students at nearby Princeton University.

    “I’ve never wanted to be an art star,” he said. “The God of the Bible is an artist, perhaps the only true artist.”

    He will admit, however, to being pleased that more of his buyers “understand the totality of who I am — not only a contemporary artist working in nihonga, but that the art is connected to the divine.”

  • The 3 Main Ingredients for Happiness

    According to studies cited in Timothy D Wilsons book ReDirect-Changing the stories we live by, there are three ingredients that contribute more than anything else to human happiness. I have commented on all three below and how all three are connected to a healthy life of faith.

    1. MEANING:

    Finding meaning. The better we understand and explain events that happen to us, especially the negative ones, the faster and fuller we recover from them. I think that this is one of the reasons that certain studies have shown that people of faith are usually happier, it is because they can find meaning or purpose in the midst of their experiences. This is powerful because the experience itself is not the end of an event, good will come from it. There’s redemption and justice to look forward to.

    One of the most popular scriptures that Christians will turn to for this is Romans 8:28 which says,

    For we know in all things God works for the good of those who love him, those who are called according to his purpose

    As humans our core narratives are derived from culture, parents, traditions and our religion. It’s why for several weeks following 911 in America churches were full. People were once again drawing on their core narratives. “In God we Trust” perhaps…

    Meaning helps us to feel special and underlines our core beliefs. Again the scriptures drip with this conclusion. In the Bible, we are called, chosen, loved, found and rescued. Although we don’t always know how to articulate or describe these things, a healthy reading of scripture should leave any person with no doubt that they are special in the eyes of God.

    Here’s a surprising scripture that reveals that to us:

    Suddenly a great company of angels appeared saying, “Glory to God in the highest, peace on earth to men on whom his favour rest.” Luke 2:13-14

    Yes, this is what the angels said to the shepherds announcing the birth of Jesus, but did you notice how it speaks of us? “Peace to men, on whom his FAVOUR rests.” God favours us! Now I have to say I didn’t always think that’s what God thought of me , of us, but years of reading the scriptures have utterly convinced me. Meaning forged from events and circumstances and derived from the knowledge of God’s view contributes hugely to human well being and happiness, so it seems.

    2. HOPE HAS REAL POWER:

    Knowing that we have some control over things, knowing that we can change has proven to be a huge motivator and contributes greatly to our happiness. As Humans we have this incredible ability to decide today to make tomorrow different and we know that we can do it. Unlike other mammals who are just going to act instinctively, we can act intentionally. For example, a baboon is just going to baboon all day long, a beaver will not have woken this morning and declared, “No more dams, I’m done with dams, from now on I’m building bridges.” No, the beaver will once again build its dams.

    This vision, this hope is proven to have real power. People who tap into this have shown themselves to be healthier, less depressed and more optimistic. Now don’t be confused about optimism, it isn’t just thinking good thoughts as opposed to negative ones. Optimism is behaving in an optimistic way. behaving in a way that says, “There is hope.” “Things can get better.” etc.. Optimists confront problems, they don’t shy away from them, they plan better and persist longer because they believe obstacles can be overcome. They have an adaptive, healthy way of coping.

    Once again the scriptures are full of these themes of hope and faith. The Christian life is defined, of course,  as a life of faith. Think of Hebrews 11:1

    Now faith is the substance of things hoped for the evidence of things not seen

    A life of faith, rather than leaving one frustrated, contributes to the state of happiness.

    Also the sense of control that we mentioned earlier is something the scriptures teach us has been gifted to us by God. In Genesis 1:26 God says,

    Let us make man in our image and let them rule…

    That word rule here doesn’t mean to dictate and command but to steward, care, lovingly control, tend. I love the way that Andy Crouch in his book Culture Making says it,

    Humans are meant to make something of this world

    When we accept that gift of control, that sense of we can do something about things, we tend to grow happier.

    3. PURPOSE

    We all know that at some point in life we ask the question why? Why am I here, is there a purpose? Nothing answers this question better than the Bible’s story. In the Bible’s story despite the fact that God is so great, good, does brilliant things, comes in the person of Jesus and does for us what we cannot do for ourselves he (God) does not set himself up as the hero.

    We are the hero. It is all done for us. When we read the first few chapters Genesis for example, God is not describing how he made the world but why he made the world. He made it for us. A place for us to thrive and flourish. A place for us to grow and develop. A place to discover. Anyone who has heard me preach in recent years as probably heard me say something like, “We were always meant to make clothes, Ferrari’s, Harley Davidsons, Hotels (because they are much better than tents) etc..” The point I have been making is this, God provided everything for us to thrive and our purpose was and is to make something great that would reflect his goodness.

    Our reflecting his goodness was meant to involve our relationships with God, others, ourselves and our world. It was meant to pull on every bit of creativity, care and love that God had placed within is. And we were meant to do it in community. This is still our purpose today. It is seen so clearly in many parts of scripture but let me turn to the calling of Abraham in Genesis chapter 12 and verse 2.

    I will make you into a great nation and I will bless you. I will make your name great and you will be a blessing.

    Did you see that? “You will be a blessing.” At the heart of faith is this sense that God will bless me, yes, but the reason is so that I, along with others, can fulfil the purpose of blessing others and caring for this world.

    BE HAPPY!

  • Prominent Biblical Scholars On Women in Leadership

    This article first appeared at http://newlife.id.au/prominent-biblical-scholars-on-women-in-ministry/

    Some Christians think that only people who have a “loose approach to scripture” can believe that women should be leaders and teachers in the church. I strongly doubt that any evangelical Christian would regard these scholars and theologians as having a loose approach to scripture, and yet each of them believes that appropriately gifted women should be leaders and teachers in the church. Here is a sample of various statements made by these prominent scholars (some of whom are now deceased.)

    F.F. Bruce (1910-1990)

    F.F. Bruce was the Rylands Professor of Biblical Criticism and Exegesis at the University of Manchester, and belonged to the Open Brethren.

    “An appeal to first principles in our application of the New Testament might demand the recognition that when the Spirit, in his sovereign good pleasure, bestows varying gifts on individual believers, these gifts are intended to be exercised for the well-being of the whole church. If he manifestly withheld the gifts of teaching or leadership from Christian women, then we should accept that as evidence of his will (1 Cor. 12:11). But experience shows that he bestows these and other gifts, with ‘undistinguishing regard’, on men and women alike―not on all women, of course, nor yet on all men. That being so, it is unsatisfactory to rest with a halfway house in this issue of women’s ministry, where they are allowed to pray and prophesy, but not to teach or lead.”
    F.F. Bruce, “Women in the Church: A Biblical Survey,” Christian Brethren Review 33 (1982) pp.7-14. (Source)

    Gordon D. Fee (b. 1934)

    Professor Emeritus of New Testament at Regent College, ordained in the Assemblies of God

    “It seems a sad commentary on the church and on its understanding of the Holy Spirit that “official” leadership and ministry is allowed to come from only one half of the community of faith. The New Testament evidence is that the Holy Spirit is gender inclusive, gifting both men and women, and thus potentially setting the whole body free for all the parts to minister and in various ways to give leadership to the others. Thus my issue in the end is not a feminist agenda—an advocacy of women in ministry. Rather, it is a Spirit agenda, a plea for the releasing of the Spirit from our strictures and structures so that the church might minister to itself and to the world more effectively.”
    “The Priority of Spirit Gifting for Church Ministry”, Discovering Biblical Equality Complementarity without Hierarchy. Ronald W. Pierce, Rebecca Merrill Groothuis, Gordon D. Fee (eds) (IVP Academic, 2012) p.254.

    Craig S. Keener (b. 1960)

    Professor of New Testament at Asbury Theological Seminary, ordained in an African-American Baptist church but serves in settings with a range of traditions.

    ” . . . we Pentecostals and charismatics affirm that the minister’s authority is inherent in the minister’s calling and ministry of the Word, not the minister’s person. In this case, gender should be irrelevant as a consideration for ministry–for us as it was for Paul. . . . Today we should affirm those whom God calls, whether male or female, and encourage them in faithfully learning God’s Word. We need to affirm all potential laborers, both men and women, for the abundant harvest fields.”
    Was Paul For or Against Women in Ministry?, Enrichment Journal, Spring 2001. (Source)

    I. Howard Marshall (1934-2015)

    Professor Emeritus of New Testament Exegesis at the University of Aberdeen, belongs to the Evangelical Methodist Church

    “Much anguish is felt by women whose God-given talents have been denied expression. This is due to the inability of complementarians to provide any coherent and persuasive reasons for denying women these [ministry] positions in church—women are asked to accept a scriptural command simply because it is God’s will even if they cannot understand why it is so. . . . [And it is due to] the arbitrariness of the way in which the ruling is put into effect, with all the going beyond what Scripture actually says and the casuistry that is employed regarding the limits of what women may and may not do.”
    Comments made at a panel discussion at the Evangelical Theological Society 2010 meeting. (Source)

    Leon Morris (1914-2006)

    New Testament scholar, ordained Anglican minister. In his commentary on Paul’s letter to the Romans, Morris stated that

    “Phoebe is certainly called a deacon” in Romans 16:1; and Junia along with Andronicus (mentioned in Romans 16:7) were “outstanding among the apostles which might mean that the apostles held them in high esteem or that they were apostles, and notable apostles at that.” Morris adds, “The former understanding seems less likely . . .” The Epistle to the Romans (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1988) p.529 & 534. Morris also wrote essays advocating for women in ministry, and he welcomed women at Ridley Theological College, Melbourne, where he was Principal from 1964 until his retirement in 1976.

    John Stott (1921-2011)

    Anglican minister, theologian, one of the principal authors of the Lausanne Covenant in 1974

    “If God endows women with spiritual gifts (which he does), and thereby calls them to exercise their gifts for the common good (which he does), the Church must recognize God’s gifts and calling, must make appropriate spheres of service available to women, and should ‘ordain’ (that is commission and authorize) them to exercise their God-given ministry, at best in team situations. Our Christian doctrines of Creation and Redemption tell us that God wants his gifted people to be fulfilled, not frustrated, and his church to be enriched by their service.”
    J.R.W Stott, Issues facing Christianity Today (Basingstoke: Marshalls, 1984) p.254.

    Ben Witherington III (b. 1951)

    Professor of New Testament Interpretation at Asbury Theological Seminary, ordained Methodist pastor

    “We need to keep steadily in mind that what determines or should determine the leadership structures in the church is not gender but rather gifts and graces of the Holy Spirit. The family of faith is not identical with the physical family, and gender is no determinant of roles in it. Gender of course does affect some roles in the Christian family, but that is irrelevant when it comes to the discussion of the leadership structure of the church. This is why we should not be surprised to find even in Paul’s letters examples of women teachers, evangelist, prophetesses, deacons, and apostles. Paul is not one who is interested in baptizing the existing fallen patriarchal order and calling it good. One of the tell tale signs of Paul’s views on such matters can be seen in what he says about baptism— it is not a gender specific sign that we have for the new covenant unlike the one for the old covenant, and Paul adds that in Christ there is no ‘male and female’ just as there is no Jew or Gentile, slave or free. The implications of this are enormous. The change in the covenant sign signals the change in the nature of the covenant when it comes to men and women.”
    Why Arguments against Women in Ministry aren’t Biblical, on Dr Witherington’s website The Bible and Culture here.

    N.T. Wright (b. 1948)

    New Testament scholar, Anglican Bishop of Durham (2003-2010)

    “It is the women who come first to the tomb, who are the first to see the risen Jesus, and are the first to be entrusted with the news that he has been raised from the dead. This is of incalculable significance. Mary Magdalene and the others are the apostles to the apostles. We should not be surprised that Paul calls a woman named Junia an apostle in Romans 16.7. If an apostle is a witness to the resurrection, there were women who deserved that title before any of the men. . . . Nor is this promotion of women a totally new thing with the resurrection. As in so many other ways, what happened then picked up hints and pinpoints from earlier in Jesus’ public career. I think in particular of the woman who anointed Jesus (without here going in to the question of who it was and whether it happened more than once); as some have pointed out, this was a priestly action which Jesus accepted as such.”
    “Women’s Service in the Church: The Biblical Basis”, a conference paper for the Symposium, Men, Women and the Church, St John’s College, Durham, September 4 2004. (Source)

    Many More . . .

    Numerous other evangelical scholars also believe that the Bible, correctly interpreted, does not restrict gifted women from any ministry function or position. There are too many to mention them all, but here are just a few: Kenneth Bailey, Gilbert Bilezikian, Michael Bird, R.T. France, Richard Hays, Kevin Giles, Joel B. Green, Stanley Grenz, David Instone-Brewer, Walter Kaiser, John R. Kohlenberger III, Richard N. Longenecker, Scot McKnight, Roger Nicole, Roger E. Olson, Philip Barton Payne, Howard Snyder, John Stackhouse, etc. (I have deliberately chosen to mention only male scholars to avoid the accusation of women being self-serving.)

    Finally, a quotation from

    Dallas Willard (1935-2013),

    “It is not the rights of women to occupy `official’ ministerial roles, nor their equality to men in those roles, that set the terms of their service to God and their neighbors. It is their obligations that do so – obligations that derive from their human abilities empowered by divine gifting.”

    How I Changed my Mind about Women in Leadership (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2010) p.10 (Italics by the author).

  • A Cassette Tape Revival – no way

    JOHN PAUL TITLOW 12.1.17
    For Andy Molholt, there’s something oddly special about hitting play on his boombox at the beach. The Philadelphia-based musician tours frequently with his band Laser Background and, between that and the many shows he helps book back home in Philly, he winds up seeing a lot of bands perform in bars, basements, and warehouses. If he likes them, he usually buys a tape.

    “It’s nice to only be able to listen to what’s in front of you, instead of having the entirety of music at your fingertips with Spotify and all that,” says Molholt of his growing tape collection. “There’s also something warm and fuzzy about tapes to me, maybe in a nostalgic kind of way.”

    He’s not alone. Over the recent holiday shopping season, U.S. artists and labels saw a 140% increase in tape sales over the previous year, according to a new music industry report from BuzzAngle. Over the course of 2016, Bandcamp saw its own 46% increase in cassette sales, according to a spokesperson for the music service. And while it’s still a tiny sliver of overall music consumption—and too small for Nielsen to care enough to track—the seemingly counterintuitive revival of cassettes shows no sign of slowing down, even as streaming music subscriptions explode. But why?

    As tempting as it may be to dismiss cassettes as another display of analog hipsterism, the mini-trend has very real, practical benefits for budding artists like Molholt, who releases music on a tape-only label called Endless Daze. For one thing, they scratch a simple economic itch. For about $2 apiece, tapes can be produced in small quantities much more quickly than vinyl records, whose own resurgence has slammed pressing plants with so much demand that a new record can take up to six months to turn around. And unlike with vinyl, musicians can produce new copies of cassettes in their apartment in a pinch.

    “You can’t quite put your finger on it. But they’re sort of fun. They’re weird little tchotchkes.”

    For newer, less established artists, tapes are also a lower-risk investment than vinyl: If your debut EP doesn’t sell, you’re not stuck sitting on a heavy box of vinyl that took over a thousand bucks and half a year to produce.

    Tapes give musicians an affordable way to sell their work to fans—usually for about five bucks apiece—and help cover their costs on the road in an age when streaming royalty checks will barely fill up the gas tank. They let fans support their favorite artists without the $25 commitment of vinyl or some other trinket emblazoned with the band’s logo. It may seem odd given the scarcity of cassette players in our lives, but if nothing else, a rectangular hunk of plastic can serve as a convenient vehicle for a free digital download of the album. Plus, it’s a souvenir.

    “For the fans, there’s a certain coolness about tapes,” says J. Edward Keyes, Bandcamp’s editorial director and a longtime music journalist, who has amassed close to 500 cassettes. “You can’t quite put your finger on it. But they’re sort of fun. They’re weird little tchotchkes.”

    Indeed, the appeal of tapes has more to do with collectibility and nostalgia than it does with convenience or sound quality. In fact, the lower audio fidelity of tapes is seldom seen as a disadvantage.

    “Tapes were biggest mostly in noise and hardcore, where the fact that they were degraded was almost kind of an asset,” says Keyes. “Because it made it sound muddier and screwed with the dynamics and the sound in an interesting way.”

    Molholt, for one, loves the sound of tapes. “I feel like everyone is obsessed with super high fidelity but I like it when things are warm and warbly,” he says.

    THE CASSETTE DECADE

    The tape revival is not a new trend. After being swiftly crushed into obsolescence by the rise of the superior-sounding compact disc in the 1980s, the U.S. cassette market started seeing a miniature revival of sorts about a decade ago, driven at first by underground and more experimental music scenes and then by more popular flavors of indie rock. By 2010, the so-called “cassette revival” had landed on the radar of mainstream media outlets like NPR and the Boston Globe, leading to an ongoing resurgence in interest from everyone from Pitchfork and Rolling Stone to Forbes and (hello) Fast Company.

    img_0054

    All along the way, the return of cassettes has seemed like a strange, low-fidelity fluke in a world being overtaken by music streaming services. But even as paid music subscriptions have approached the 100 million mark, offering new signs of industry growth as physical albums continue their years-long free-fall, the cassette tape refuses to die.

    Since 2013, music retailers have celebrated Cassette Store Day with special tape releases.

    In large part, we have in-the-know music obsessives like Molholt and Keyes to thank. But in recent years, we’ve seen tapes inch toward an unexpectedly mainstream sort of hipness, complete with Urban Outfitters selling tape players and used cassettes. That retailer, which produces its own limited-run mix tapes for promotional purposes, declined to comment for this article. But suffice it to say that its stamp of approval makes the tape trend officially “cool” in the eyes of many millennial consumers (even if it elicits a groan from punk bands and noise artists who have long embraced the format).

    Since 2013, music retailers have also celebrated Cassette Store Day with special tape releases, hoping to extend the success of Record Store Day to a less popular format. To some, these music-buying holidays are a cheesy gimmick. To others, anything that will get consumers to pay for music, 15 years after Napster, is worthwhile.

    Major labels have taken note. The 2014 release of the Guardians of the Galaxy soundtrack on cassette may have been a somewhat clever marketing tactic for the movie (whose storyline features a mixtape filled with throwback hits from the ’70s and ’80s), but there’s no such rationale to explain why Justin Bieber, Eminem, Macklemore, and Twenty One Pilots have put out tapes in the last year or two. But again, whatever it takes to get people to pay for music.

    “I do arch an eyebrow when I see major labels putting things out on tape,” says Keyes. “That, to me, is just purely cashing in on what they perceive as kind of a trend. To me, tapes are really for smaller bands and record labels. Not because Columbia wanted to reissue the Top Gun soundtrack for the hundredth time. Something about that is a little more bogus to me.”

    Keyes now has a routine habit of buying tapes at shows or, quite naturally, ordering them online from his employer Bandcamp. At the Latinx Punk Festival in Brooklyn last summer, he bought tapes from many of the bands he saw, who hailed from all over the world. The fact that they all sold cassettes allowed him to easily collect their music for later listening, something that would be cost-prohibitive with vinyl and downright annoying with streaming services.
    ONE TANGIBLE THING
    In an age when most music exists on the boundless, only somewhat navigable reservoir of sound called the internet, splintered across streaming services, YouTube embeds, torrents, and message board threads, there’s something to be said for the tangibility and simplicity of physical media. Like reading a book or a paper magazine, listening to vinyl or cassettes pulls us out of the digital ocean for 45 minutes or so and forces us to focus on one thing. What a concept.

    As a bonus, Keyes notes, cassettes often look cool. “They usually do such a nice job with the cover art, especially [tape label] Orange Milk,” he says. “They have such a clear aesthetic and design. It kind of makes you want to buy them all and line them all up.”

    Trendy as they may be, nobody is predicting that tapes are going to explode into a dominant force in the music industry. Not even vinyl, which has been growing in popularity for several years, has a chance of reversing the inevitable trend toward the all-you-can-stream, subscription-based music economy. But don’t expect cassettes to go away anytime soon, either.

    “I can’t predict whether it will make mainstream inroads,” says Keyes. “But as a viable method for artists to put out music in a physical format, I wouldn’t be surprised to see it grow.”

  • 5 Big Wins From Creating A Culture of Trust

    For 15 years two Stanford Professors, James Baron and Michael Hannan, collected data and studied high tech start ups in Silicon Valley. They were intrigued to discover the five distinct cultures that were represented by the start ups and also to observe the performance of these distinct cultures over time.

    Here are the 5 Cultures

    1. STAR CULTURE:These companies hired people from the elite universities like Harvard etc. or high performance employees from successful companies. These companies had employee autonomy believing that the high skill/intelligence factor would turn into high performance for the company.
    2. ENGINEERING CULTURE: These companies hired predominantly problem solvers people who could find ways to do things.
    3. BUREAUCRATIC CULTURE: These companies ended up with lots of middle managers, long job descriptions, employee handbooks, lots of meetings, company handbooks, huge policies and procedures manuals. Things in these cultures were done ‘by the book’.
    4. AUTOCRATIC CULTURE: These companies established clear ways of working  but it was all to please the boss. ‘Do what I say and you get paid.”
    5. COMMITMENT CULTURE: These companies established a set of values that employees owned. Often in these cultures growth was initially slow. These companies were hesitant to lay people off, had a high value of people and high value in respect of training and development. This became a culture of mutual trust.

    RESULTS

    How did these companies perform?

    Star culture companies were some of the biggest winners however, unexpectantly, these companies also failed in record numbers.

    The only culture that was a consistent winner was the commitment culture

    • Not one of these firms failed
    • They consistently out performed every other type of culture in all meaningful ways. They were the fastest to go public. They were leaner (fewer middle managers). They knew their customers better.
    • The sense of Trust between workers was high. This meant that people actually worked together and stood together when they faced set backs.
    • They experienced a much higher level of psychological safety which meant greater agility. (Openness to change, willingness to experiment etc.)

    The Agile method, as this culture became known, pushed decision making to whoever was closest to the problem. Successful companies that have done this and found great success include: GM & Toyota partnership at the NUMMI car plant, Pixar, The FBI in their sentinel programme, Hospitals that adopt ‘lean healthcare’ methods.

    LESSONS: The 5 Big Wins from a Culture of Trust

    1. People are willing to swing for the fences more (experiment) when they know that they wont be punished for missing the ball.
    2. Potential is unlocked in people who are given authority and ownership.
    3. People follow instincts more when they feel empowered.
    4. People generate more ideas when they know that their ideas are welcomed and will not be ignored, even if they are not implemented.
    5. People thrive when they have a real sense that others have their backs.

    All of these 5 big wins are related to people (employees), perhaps it’s true that a company’s greatest assets are the people.

  • 7 Reasons Churches Get ‘Stuck’

    When you are a person of vision and wanting to see things move forward it can be the most frustrating thing in the world to feel stuck. This is true in every field of work and life. Helping to identify why you are stuck is a huge help. Here are 7 reasons why churches get stuck.

    1. They are governed by large siced leadership teams and many committees.

    Sometimes the  structure for decision-making can be so complex that It feels like we need a committee to finding people to serve on committees. Ideadly one leadership team with 7-9 people is best (follow the pizza rule. A decision making meeting is ideal when everyone can be served by having no more than 2 full-size pizzas that are shared) The goal is to get everyone else serving on a ministry team rather than participating in committee meetings.

    img_0210

    2. They don’t empower volunteers.

    The first goal is to get staff or key volunteers leading ministry teams rather than reporting to committees (see above). Once that shift happens, the next goal is get staff and key volunteer to start building volunteer teams to do the ministry. It’s not unusual, though, for staff to hold on to doing all the ministry in mid-size churches. Think children’s ministry. Think pastoral care. Staff need to begin equipping God’s people to do the work of the ministry. Pastors need a mind shift here. So many that I meet think I need a staff person to do this or that we need to re-look at Ephesians 4:11-12.

    3. They’re unwilling to address facility constraints.

    Sometimes those constraints happen because of limited seating for adults. More oftentimes, though, the constraints aren’t as visible because they impact guests more than they do people who are already connected to the church. Those hidden constraints may include lack of parking, welcoming and obvious entrances, children’s ministry space, adequate lobby space, clear directional signage and so on. The key question is to consider how is the guest experience impacted by our facility? Also remember when a space is at 70-80% capacity it is full. It’s time to add another service or increase the space.

    4. Children’s ministry doesn’t become a priority.

    Ironically, churches tend to hire a youth pastor before they hire a children’s ministry pastor. Part of the reason why is that they’re really only focused on babysitting kids. The better space and the stronger leaders are focused on adults and students. The challenge is that unless churches give their best to children’s ministry, they’ll never reach their parents. That’s one of the reasons why some churches have a chasm of missing 25 to 35-year-old adults.

    5. They haven’t identified their primary purpose and distinctives.

    Here’s the challenge. Once you start reaching more people, it’s very easy to continue adding programming. Before you know it, things become very complex with multiple ministries competing for volunteers, leaders, money, space, promotions, etc. Mid-size churches need to define their mission, vision and strategy. By doing this, they’ll be in a better position to begin focusing resources on the areas of ministry that define who they are as a church. It will create a filter for leaders to begin saying no more often. That focus will increase ministry effectiveness and leverage resources for greater impact.

    6. The quality of weekend environments doesn’t reflect the size of the church.

    For good or bad, as the size of the environment grows, so do quality expectations. Of course, the primary place this will be felt is with the worship service environment for adults, but the same principle will apply in every environment including children’s ministry, students, guest experiences, courselves and so on. With worship, though, there needs to be more intentionality around planning, preparation and execution. That includes not only the teaching but everything else that happens during the service.

    7. They don’t raise their own leaders.

    I alluded to this earlier, but many times churches don’t empower proactively. At this stage, it becomes more and more important that churches begin to appoint leaders rather than doers. You’ll need to focus on staff/key volunteers who can grow ministries and reach more people. That means support roles (assistants, bookkeepers, associate pastors, etc.) may have to wait. These become great opportunities for volunteer engagement or outsourcing. The priority needs to be finding staff/volunteer leaders who can build volunteer teams, build healthy ministries and build a strategy to reach new people.

     

  • HOW TO MAKE A SIGN

    How to make a sign

    This post appeared first on Sethgodin.typepad.com

    There it is, at every entrance to the terminal at LaGuardia, one of the busiest airports in the world:

    TERMINAL CLOSED
    FOR MAINTENANCE

    between 12:00 a.m.
    and 4:00 a.m.
    until further notice.

    Ticketed Passengers &
    Employees ONLY
    will have access
    to Terminal.

    A few questions on our way to fixing this:

    Who is it for?

    What impact will it have on everyone else?

    To the sign maker: Are you angry? Frustrated? Trying to teach people a lesson?

    What does it sound like when you read it aloud?

    and… is it clear?

    When I look at this sign, I wonder why it needs to say, “until further notice.” After all, aren’t all rules in place until further notice?

    And why say 12:00 a.m. when midnight is so much more clear?

    Do we really need to alert employees to this rule every day?

    Mostly, though, the headline is confusing (every person reading this sign for the first time is sure the terminal is closed right this minute, until they read the next line).

    Perhaps, then, it might be a better sign if it said:

    Hi. To keep this terminal clean, it’s closed
    to visitors from midnight until 4 a.m. every night.
    Ticketed passengers are always welcome.

    Thank you.

    Want more on this? Check out Dan Pink

  • REDIRECT – How do we change the stories that we live by?

    For centuries philosophers have known that it is not primarily what we observe that influences us the most. It is how we interpret and make sense of those observation that has the most powerful influence upon us. This is because our brains are CLARITY junkies.

    YOUR BRAIN AND CLARITY

    Basically, the brain is constantly trying to do two things:
    1. Keep Us Alive
    2. Conserve Calories

    One of the ways it conserves calories is by deciding where it will commit its resources, i.e. Brain cells. So, unless retrained, the brain will interpret things in the quickest possible fashion that brings some clarity so that it doesn’t have to waste any energy on what it views unnecessary learning. The challenge of this is that the Brain can only make these decisions based on what it already knows, what it is already used to. This is why change can be so hard for us, we fight a brain that initially doesn’t want to commit any energy to things because it is quickly and efficiently filing stuff away saying, “I’ve seen that before. i know how this works.”

    STORY THE REAL POWER BEHIND CHANGE

    Have you seen this picture?
    img_0042

    What is it? A Duck or a Rabbit? The answer is not necessarily either, it depends on how your  brain interprets it. Now here’s the interesting thing. If we see this picture on Easter Sunday 82% of us will say, “It’s a bunny.” However, if we see this picture on a sunday in October 90% of us will see the Duck first. What that reveals to us is that context or story determines how we interpret things.

    When something happens to us our brains try to make sense of it and the way that they do that is by connecting it quickly and efficiently to the bigger stories of our lives.

    Therefore we desperately need a healthy bigger narrative story for our lives, that will help us interpret things that happen to us in a way that aids growth and progress.

    Several studies have shown that people of faith tend to be happier on average than people who declare no faith. I believe that this is one of the main reasons. Their faith gives them a bigger, clear story that they are a part of and this helps them to find meaning for events and circumstances they may find themselves a part of.

    This matters because if we find ourselves or our friends, or people we are trying to help stuck in a negative, self-defeating cycle there is hope and that hope lies in changing the story. There are three main ways that this can happen:

    1. STORY EDITING

    Many people find themselves trying to just banish the effects that circumstances or perceptions or culture or actions have created for them. This often proves only mildly helpful at best. Story editing seeks to target the long standing narratives that are creating the negative and destructive perceptions

    Editing these personal interpretations is like changing the start of a movie. A delayed writing exercise has been proven helpful in this regard. That is, rather than writing immediately about our feelings or what has happened to us people who delayed their responses proved more able to give meaning and thereby, as they take a step back they can reframe what has happened to them. Sometimes, immediately putting down our thoughts, feelings and responses to circumstances actually reinforces harmful perceptions and can make healing more difficult.

    Susan Sontag wrote this:

    I write to define myself – an act of self-creation, part of the process of becoming.

    For people of faith, I believe that prayer can be powerful in this regard. Through prayer we find meaning and reframe our world into a world that has purpose, meaning and justice. We prophecy through prayer that our past does not determine our future. We may not always realise it but through prayer we are changing the story of our lives and the story of future generations.

    2. STORY PROMPTING

    Sometimes we need a nudge. There are times when we do not have the energy to edit our own stories as described above and therefore we need a prompt, a nudge.

    e.g. A group of college students who all performed worse than they expected at the end of their first year were divided into two groups. One group was given a 30 minute session about other students who had struggled in year 1 but had ended college with good grades. The session included statistics and testimonies. The results were that this group had less students drop out in YR2 than the other group and they also achieved better grades than those who didn’t have the lesson. They were given a nudge into a better story

    3. STORY WRITING

    We could call this ‘acting our way into right thinking’. I think that all of the approaches have some biblical foundation but that this accords very strongly with a biblical view take for example 1 Peter 1: 13 which says,

    “So prepare your minds for action and exercise self-control…”

    The idea here is that we act in a way consistent with the better story we are a part of and has we do we find ourselves being changed. Consistency in the same activities means that the brain becomes willing to expend resources in that direction.

    Aristotle believed this strongly, he said, “We become just by performing just actions – courageous by performing acts of courage.”